Mohamed Sayed Ahmed Shehata1,2
1 Professor of Hadith and its Science, Al Azhar University, Faculty of Origins of Religion, Assiut
2 Professor of Hadith and its Science, Now: Majmaah University, Zulfi College of Education
Issue 89 | Pages:110-135 | June 2022 | https://doi.org/10.54940/si89695019 | PDF
1 Professor of Hadith and its Science, Al Azhar University, Faculty of Origins of Religion, Assiut
2 Professor of Hadith and its Science, Now: Majmaah University, Zulfi College of Education
Issue 89 | Pages:110-135 | June 2022 | https://doi.org/10.54940/si89695019 | PDF
Abstract
The subject of the research: the accepted narrators who accused the scholars of Al-Jarh and Al-Ta’deel of lying. Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar alerted them to the delusion of these imams, and answered that.
One of the objectives of the research: to find out the reason for this strictness, and to clarify the reality of the narrator›s condition in terms of justice and wounding..
The research method was deductive analytical
Among the most important results: that one of the reasons for accusing the narrator of lying is the difference of faith, sometimes because of the harshness of the critic, and sometimes because of the narrator’s narration about the weak. Among the most important recommendations: taking care of the science of rectification, as well as paying attention to the encyclopedias of the wound and the amendment, especially the appendices of sayings.
Keywords
(wounding and amending - lying - accusation of lying - acceptable - trust - honesty - exaggeration)
How to Cite
Shehata, S. Mohamed, (2022), Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar›s Warnings on the critic Imams for the accusation of discreditation to trustworthy narrators: Critical study using rapproachment (Taqreeb), Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Shari'ah and Islamic Studies, Issue.89.110-135. https://doi.org/10.54940/si89695019